Reading Conferences

Routman writes, "It is our job as knowledgeable professionals to ensure that our students are reading what they are supposed to be reading that means that they are effectively using phonics, word analysis, comprehension strategies, and whatever else they bring to the text to understand it. Otherwise we are squandering precioius time."

The above quote resonates with me as it gives the reasoning behind informal reading conferences. As teachers we are not here to simply get children to read or even teach them to read but help with the transition from learning to read to reading to learn. What I also appreciate about reading conferences is that students could pick their own goal for reading make a picture in your mind to help with comprehension, think about why characters act and behave the way they do and many more. I also like that the idea of reading conferences fits it with an optimal learning model of responsibility slowing switching from the teacher to the student. Reading conferences can help with this transition as the teacher helps students focus on certain skills within reading but giving students the autonomy and some of the responsibility by letting students pic there own goal when reading and working towards that. I also like how in general students just get to share what they are reading and in turn I would think teachers can get to know their students better. Overall I feel that the process would also support more student confidence in themselves as readers as students set goals of their own choice and reach them with perhaps some guided help from the instructor.

Assessment

In Ranking, Evaluating and Liking: Sorting Out Three Forms of Judgment by Peter Elbow, he states that,”Evaluation requires going beyond a first response that may be nothing but a kind of ranking (‘I like it’ or ‘This is better than that’), and instead looking carefully enough at the performance or person to make distinctions between parts or features or criteria.” This quote defines for me the dilemma I as a teacher will face with assessment. I want to set standards and expectations that are upheld, but at the same time I need to make sure in my assessment of student work and thinking especially with writing that there is room for creativity. The 6 Traits of writing is a great guideline for evaluating students work but this evaluation should be ongoing and congruent with the development of the student.

Also I think as the teacher which ever “ranking”, as Elbow would call it, students may receive should not come as a surprise to the students. Assessment should be a combination of their own evaluation on their writing through a variety of communications through formal and informal conferences as well as a graded rubric of expectations. What kind of teacher would I be if I handed students expectations, a rubric, for an assignment but did not guide and support them to reach those expectations?